PJM Interconnection Queue Report | An M&A perspective
A data-driven look at the PJM interconnection queue: cost variation, structural risk, and the 2027 bottleneck, written for renewable M&A teams.
A data-driven look at the PJM interconnection queue: cost variation, structural risk, and the 2027 bottleneck, written for renewable M&A teams.
Report
Cost, timing, and ownership signals across 100,000+ MW under study in the PJM queue.

Key finding
Cost, timing, and ownership signals across 100,000+ MW under study in the PJM queue.
Opportunity is concentrated in specific parts of the queue.
Interconnection Cost Distribution
$0.05/W → $0.33/W
across PJM
Interconnection costs vary significantly by region
What we found
Cost hotspots
Where upgrade costs are concentrated across the queue.
Where queue volume is crowded
Where project volume is highest and developer activity is densest.
COD timing pressure
Where multiple projects are targeting the same COD windows.
Ownership concentration
Where a small number of developers hold large portions of the queue.
Key insight
Cost, timing, and ownership patterns shape which projects are realistically actionable. Without this view, teams spend time on projects that won't move forward, while missing stronger opportunities elsewhere in the queue.
The report quantifies where these risks concentrate — by region, by developer, and by timeline.
Structural Risk Factors
Relative impact across PJM queue projects
Project Density by Target COD Year
High concentration of projects targeting 2027
Supporting insight
A large share of projects in the PJM queue are targeting similar COD timelines in 2027. This clustering concentrates timelines into a narrow window across parts of the queue, making relative positioning and sequencing more important.

Inside the analysis
Enter your details to access the full analysis.
Go deeper
The report shows the structure of the PJM queue. iQueue explores the project level, with live cost and ownership data on every asset.
Explore iQueue