PJM Interconnection Queue Report | An M&A perspective

A data-driven look at the PJM interconnection queue: cost variation, structural risk, and the 2027 bottleneck, written for renewable M&A teams.

Report The PJM Interconnection Queue: An M&A Perspective Cost, timing, and ownership signals across 100,000+ MW under study in the PJM queue. Access the full analysis PJM Interconnection Queue: An M&A Perspective — report cover Key finding Interconnection cost varies significantly across PJM Opportunity is concentrated in specific parts of the queue. Interconnection Cost Distribution $0.05/W → $0.33/W across PJM Virginia $0.33/W State 2 $0.21/W State 3 $0.14/W State 4 $0.09/W State 5 $0.05/W Interconnection costs vary significantly by region 100,000+ MW under study · Solar, Storage, Wind, Natural Gas · EP, TC1, TC2 process cycles What we found What the data shows Cost hotspots Where upgrade costs are concentrated across the queue. Where queue volume is crowded Where project volume is highest and developer activity is densest. COD timing pressure Where multiple projects are targeting the same COD windows. Ownership concentration Where a small number of developers hold large portions of the queue. Key insight Project selection carries structural risk Cost, timing, and ownership patterns shape which projects are realistically actionable. Without this view, teams spend time on projects that won't move forward, while missing stronger opportunities elsewhere in the queue. The report quantifies where these risks concentrate — by region, by developer, and by timeline. Structural Risk Factors Interconnection cost variance 85 % Ownership concentration 62 % COD clustering 74 % Upgrade cost exposure 58 % Relative impact across PJM queue projects Project Density by Target COD Year 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030+ High concentration of projects targeting 2027 Supporting insight The 2027 bottleneck A large share of projects in the PJM queue are targeting similar COD timelines in 2027. This clustering concentrates timelines into a narrow window across parts of the queue, making relative positioning and sequencing more important. See the full breakdown Inside the analysis - 100,000+ MW of projects analyzed - Cost, timing, and ownership signals across the full queue - Project-level breakdowns across regions and clusters - Identification of structural bottlenecks and patterns Download the report See where cost, timing, and ownership concentrate across PJM Enter your details to access the full analysis. Go deeper Explore the queue at the project level The report shows the structure of the PJM queue. iQueue explores the project level, with live cost and ownership data on every asset.

Report

The PJM Interconnection Queue: An M&A Perspective

Cost, timing, and ownership signals across 100,000+ MW under study in the PJM queue.

PJM Interconnection Queue: An M&A Perspective — report cover

Key finding

Interconnection cost varies significantly across PJM

Cost, timing, and ownership signals across 100,000+ MW under study in the PJM queue.

Opportunity is concentrated in specific parts of the queue.

Interconnection Cost Distribution

$0.05/W $0.33/W

across PJM

Virginia
$0.33/W
State 2
$0.21/W
State 3
$0.14/W
State 4
$0.09/W
State 5
$0.05/W

Interconnection costs vary significantly by region

100,000+ MW under studySolar, Storage, Wind, Natural GasEP, TC1, TC2 process cycles

What we found

What the data shows

Cost hotspots

Where upgrade costs are concentrated across the queue.

Where queue volume is crowded

Where project volume is highest and developer activity is densest.

COD timing pressure

Where multiple projects are targeting the same COD windows.

Ownership concentration

Where a small number of developers hold large portions of the queue.

Key insight

Project selection carries structural risk

Cost, timing, and ownership patterns shape which projects are realistically actionable. Without this view, teams spend time on projects that won't move forward, while missing stronger opportunities elsewhere in the queue.

The report quantifies where these risks concentrate — by region, by developer, and by timeline.

Structural Risk Factors

Interconnection cost variance85%
Ownership concentration62%
COD clustering74%
Upgrade cost exposure58%

Relative impact across PJM queue projects

Project Density by Target COD Year

2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030+

High concentration of projects targeting 2027

Supporting insight

The 2027 bottleneck

A large share of projects in the PJM queue are targeting similar COD timelines in 2027. This clustering concentrates timelines into a narrow window across parts of the queue, making relative positioning and sequencing more important.

PJM Interconnection Queue: An M&A Perspective — report cover

Inside the analysis

Inside the analysis

  • 100,000+ MW of projects analyzed
  • Cost, timing, and ownership signals across the full queue
  • Project-level breakdowns across regions and clusters
  • Identification of structural bottlenecks and patterns

See where cost, timing, and ownership concentrate across PJM

Enter your details to access the full analysis.

Go deeper

Explore the queue at the project level

The report shows the structure of the PJM queue. iQueue explores the project level, with live cost and ownership data on every asset.

Explore iQueue